Monthly Archives: October 2013

“I Want to Teach Because I Love Kids”… That Wasn’t Me

I shared three inventories (love language, personality, and strengths) in my last two posts that have brought some clarity to my life.  It’s enlightening and useful to think through some specifics about why one “ticks” the way one “ticks”.  It’s given me food for thought on how to more effectively navigate my life, knowing my tendencies and “social graces” that require intentional effort (and prayer) on my part.

The inconsistency has not escaped me:  How did a non-words of encouragement, lion, beaver, achiever, focus, learner, relator, deliberative, non-woo function for 14 years in a first grade classroom?   I’ve actually given it much thought.

The majority of pre-service teachers who came into my classroom for observations and student teaching would say in some form or fashion, “I want to teach because I love kids.”  That wasn’t me.  In fact, I hadn’t been around young children at all when I was 19.  I babysat RARELY and looking back I confess that I wasn’t very enthusiastic about it when I did.  I have twin sisters who were five years younger than me, and while I love them dearly and consider them to be two of my very best friends, I did not make time for them when I was in high school.  I was much too busy with my much too important life (tongue in cheek).

I’ve often heard a combination of, “I love playing with kids, making crafts, decorating bulletin boards, and planning parties,” over the years.  That wasn’t me either.

I can’t tell you exactly how I ended up in elementary education.  In fact, education was my third declared major.  Initially, I enrolled in the ENMU music therapy program.  After struggling through music theory my first semester, I knew additional theory classes would have equated to collegiate suicide.

I transferred to Howard Payne University after my first year at ENMU.  The Douglas MacArthur Academy of Freedom at HPU offered a fantastic scholarship opportunity for students who double majored in the Academy’s inter-disciplinary social sciences program and their chosen path.  I had taken two psychology classes my freshman year at ENMU and liked them well enough to registered at HPU as an Academy/Psychology double major.  I’m not sure how I moved from psychology to elementary education, but I remember liking my developmental psychology classes.

My father was a high school band director.  His long hours and low pay led me to swear as a teen that I would never teach.  Even when I decided to major in education, 1st grade never crossed my mind.  I loved my history and political science classes at The Academy and planned to work with middle school and junior high students.  I thought I could motivate children to love American History as I had grown to love it.

My first two years of teaching, I taught 5th grade social studies and science in Waco, Texas.  I taught in a poverty stricken neighborhood.  It was an eye-opening experience.  While teaching in Waco, I started my Med at ENMU, thinking that administration would be my ultimate career, and when I’d completed all that I could during summers on campus and through “correspondence” I moved back to Portales.

I accepted a position teaching “Title I Reading”, pulling 2nd and 3rd grade students out of their classrooms for 30 minute tutoring sessions.  I was unprepared for teaching a child to read but I enjoyed the challenge and had begun to see that I could make a difference in a child’s academic progress through consistency, well prepared lessons and analysis.

In 1999 I was asked to consider a professional development opportunity that would require considerable travel, time, and training.  After 1 year in Portales, I was still low man on the totem pole.  I didn’t know that I could have said, “No thank you, I’d rather not,” and the challenge of a new opportunity appealed to me.  My training year in Reading Recovery® and a change in my assignment from 3rd to 1st grade led to the discovery of my niche.

For 14 years I taught first grade children to read.  The final three were spent in a Dual Language classroom where I often had a child appear at 8:00am straight from Mexico without a word of English.  I couldn’t have asked for a more meaningful assignment.  I know that I made a difference, and even on the most difficult days, I loved the actual time on task problem solving and teaching children.

Teaching changed significantly in the 17 years I taught.  It was never nor is it now an easy job.  Students in a classroom run the gamut of extremes in income and living conditions, achievement, behavior, and motivation, and the political climate is enough to make any teacher hang up the lesson plans.  In the classroom it often feels, politically, that teachers can’t win for losing.  50 hours a week, piles of paperwork, and entitlement that too often pits the teacher as the enemy is disheartening, to say the very least, and needless to say, it certainly kept me challenged, focused, and intense day after day.

Franklin would occasionally come into my classroom.  When he walked in to grab something I would smile and wave but we rarely talked.  To be honest, I just didn’t have time to stop.  I was reading with a small group, taking a running record with an individual child, prompting the class through word work, or helping a child think through a tricky spot in math with a picture or our classroom “thinking tools”.  I often heard from visitors, and Franklin said it many times, “I couldn’t do your job.”

The end of the year was always exciting for me as I considered the growth of every child.  I’m grateful to have had the opportunity to serve the students I worked with.  I believe that every child who ever landed on my roster was in my room for a reason.  For a very specific reason, that child was given to me for 180 days.  For 180 days I made a powerful difference in the lives of each of my precious kids.  Our classroom might not have been a woo-hoo classroom, but it was the classroom of a lion, beaver, achiever, focus, learner, relator, deliberative who learned over the years that a little bit of golden retriever, otter, and “woo” was necessary along the way.

Paint the Town Red? No Thanks. I’m Busy Making my To-Do List

1996-1997 was my first year of teaching, and I found myself staring at a group of 25 5th graders in Waco, Texas.  Although I graduated from Howard Payne University with a double major and a history minor, I was completely unprepared for that year.  It is a blog post in and of itself; but I was introduced, for the first time, to personality types and inventories.  They’ve certainly become popular in the last 20 years, but to that point I had not seen personality categories quite so simply summarized.

The guidance counselor did a great job summarizing 4 basic personality types using a model developed by Dr. Gary Smalley and Dr. John Trent.  This kid friendly inventory was based on animal like behaviors.

Lion (Choleric/Dominance:  Strengths– Visionary, practical, productive, strong-willed, independent, decisive, leader  Weaknesses– Cold, domineering, unemotional self-sufficient, unforgiving, sarcastic, cruel

Beaver (Melancholy/Compliance):  Strengths– Analytical, self-disciplined, industrious, organized, aesthetic, sacrificing  Weaknesses– Moody, self-centered, touchy, negative, unsociable, critical, revengeful

Golden Retriever (Phlegmatic/Steadiness):  Strengths– Calm, easy-going, dependable, quiet, objective, diplomatic, humorous  Weaknesses– Selfish, stingy, procrastinator, unmotivated, indecisive, fearful, worrier

Otter (Sanguine/Influence):  Strengths– Outgoing, responsive, warm, friendly, talkative, enthusiastic, compassionate  Weaknesses– Undisciplined, unproductive, exaggerates, egocentric, unstable

I don’t remember how she presented the inventory, but I took the challenge along with my kids.  I have chewed on the results and have very deliberately thought about my basic tendencies (and how bothersome they can be for others) ever since.

Unfortunately, I was a 50/50 combo lion and beaver.   Those 2 general categories of personalities are the “hard” personalities.  Lions and beavers, when left unchecked, can be abrasive and difficult to deal with.  In contrast, the otter and golden retriever are the “soft” personalities.  They tend to be more open and easy to get along with.  In general, I had little to no natural proclivity toward otter or golden retriever.  Hmm.  No wonder I had very few friends growing up.

I desperately hope I would not “rate” exactly as I did when I was 21.  God has dealt with me in many areas of my life, and although I do believe He gave me the personality I need to complete the “call” He has for me in my life, the gospels have so much to say about love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.  I want those fruit to be a testimony to God’s grace and goodness in my life.

Not long ago I completed yet another inventory.  Strengths Finder 2.0, by Tom Rath, is often used in organizations to strategically match people to project requirements.  In capitalizing on talents and strengths, when using the Strengths Finder inventory, the right people will be positioned in the right place for maximum productivity.

While working for the public schools, teachers and staff are asked twice a year to complete a climate survey.  While I don’t remember the wording exactly, one question in particular speaks to this idea, “Do you have the opportunity to do what you do best, every day?”  According to Rath, if your Talents (your natural way of thinking, feeling, or behaving) are coupled with Investment (time spent practicing, developing your skills, and building your knowledge base), you will be a mighty asset in your workplace with Strength (the ability to consistently provide near perfect performance).

My results were not surprising, they gave depth and clarity to the child-geared inventory I took 18 years ago, and Strengths Finder 2.0 gives strategies for building on each of your top “themes” in a section called Ideas for Action.

Below you’ll find my top five themes and the first paragraph from Strength Finder 2.0’s summary of each of my themes.  Drum Roll, please.

Achiever –  Your Achiever theme helps explain your drive.  Achiever describes a constant need for achievement.  You feel as if every day starts at zero.  By the end of the day you must achieve something tangible in order to feel good about yourself.  And by “every day” you mean every single day – workdays, weekends, and vacations.

Focus –  “Where am I headed?” you ask yourself.  You ask this question every day.  Guided by this theme of focus, you need a clear destination.  Lacking one, your life and your work can quickly become frustrating.  And so each year, each month, and even each week you set goals.

Learner – You love to learn.  The subject matter that interests you most will be determined by your other themes and experiences, but whatever the subject, you will always be drawn to the process of learning.

Relator –  In simple terms, the Relator theme pulls you toward people you already know.  You do not necessarily shy away from meeting new people, but you do derive a great deal of pleasure and strength from being around your close friends.  For you a relationship only has value if it is genuine.

Deliberative –  You are careful.  You are vigilant.  You know that the world is an unpredictable place.  Everything may seem in order, but beneath the surface you sense the many risks.  Rather than denying these risks, you draw each one out into the open.  Then each risk can be identified, assessed, and ultimately reduced.  Others can run through life recklessly if they so choose, but you take a different approach.  You identify the dangers, weigh their relative impact, and then place your feet deliberately.

As important when one contemplates one’s top “themes” is acknowledging what is not on the list.  Again, no wonder I’m not often invited to join in when one hopes to “paint the town red”.  I certainly think the following are important, but I have to intentionally function in these areas as they are not my inclination:  Adaptability, Connectedness, Empathy, Harmony, Includer, Positivity, Restorative, and Woo.

The “Woo” category makes me laugh.  My mother is a “Woo”.  I am the opposite of a “Woo”.  From the summary of a “Woo”;  Woo stands for winning others over.  Strangers are rarely intimidating to you.  On the contrary, strangers can be energizing.  You are drawn to them.  You want to learn their names, ask them questions, and find some area of common interest so that you can strike up a conversation and build a rapport.  There are always new people to meet, new rooms to work, new crowds to mingle in.  In your world there are no strangers, only friends you haven’t met yet – lots of them.

Food for thought, maybe, or maybe you now know more about me than you cared to!  Either way, I’ve included a link to the official Strength Finder through Gallup.  I did find several “free” options but they do not look to be the same (caveat emptor).  https://www.gallupstrengthscenter.com/Purchase/